MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4385163322 · doi:10.1101/2023.07.19.23292550

Multi-omics analysis in primary T cells elucidates mechanisms behind disease associated genetic loci

2023· preprint· en· W4385163322 on OpenAlexaff
Chenfu Shi, Danyun Zhao, Stefano Rossi, Antonios Frantzeskos, James Ding, Carlo Ferrazzano, Charlotte Wynn, Ryan Malcolm Hum, Ellie Richards, Muskan Gupta, Chuan Fu Yap, Darren Plant, Richard K. Grencis, Paul Martin, Antony Adamson, Stephen Eyre, John Bowes, Anne Barton, Pauline Ho, Magnus Rattray, Gisela Orozco

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersMedical Research CouncilManchester Biomedical Research CentreVersus ArthritisNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchUniversity of ManchesterWellcome Trust
KeywordsCTCFChromatinGenome-wide association studyBiologyLocus (genetics)GeneticsEnhancerGeneComputational biologyTranscription factorSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT In this study, we present the most extensive dataset of chromatin conformation data with matching gene expression and chromatin accessibility from primary T cells to date. We use this data to enhance our understanding of the different mechanisms by which GWAS variants impact gene regulation and revealing how natural genetic variation alter chromatin accessibility and structure in primary cells at an unprecedented scale. Capitalizing on this vast dataset, we refine the mapping of GWAS loci to implicated regulatory elements, such as CTCF binding sites and other enhancer elements, aiding gene assignment. Importantly, we uncover BCL2L11 as the probable causal gene within the RA locus rs13396472, despite the GWAS variants’ intronic positioning relative to ACOXL and we identify mechanisms involving SESN3 dysregulation in the RA locus rs4409785. Given these genes’ significant role in T cell development and maturation, our work is vital for deepening our comprehension of autoimmune disease pathogenesis and suggesting potential treatment targets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicT-cell and B-cell Immunology→French-language works237,207→