MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385185962 · doi:10.1159/000530326

Preservation of Vision after Early Recognition of Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy in a Patient with Sepsis

2023· article· en· W4385185962 on OpenAlex
Amir R. Vosoughi, Jonathan A. Micieli

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCase Reports in Ophthalmology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
Canadian institutionsKensington HealthUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnterior ischemic optic neuropathyOptic neuropathyIschemic optic neuropathyShock (circulatory)OphthalmologySepsisEdemaSurgeryOptic nerveInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) can rarely occur in the setting of sudden vascular compromise, especially in patients with a "disk-at-risk" appearance. Anemia and hypotension are believed to be the main precipitators of shock-induced NAION. Early recognition of this phenomenon can prevent further visual loss and result in partial visual recovery. We here present a 56-year-old patient who developed NAION characterized by optic disc edema in both eyes and visual loss in the left eye secondary to hypotension in the setting of septic shock. He received aggressive blood pressure management (stopping all his anti-hypertensives, hydration, and midrodrine) which resulted in stabilization of vision in the right eye and likely prevented further visual loss in the left eye.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it