MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Biological Foundations of Synchrony: Implications for Team Outcomes

2023· article· en· W4385211011 on OpenAlexaff
Adam M. Kleinbaum, Nir Milstein, Alon Burns, Stefan Volk, Yair Berson

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademy of Management Proceedings · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAction Observation and Synchronization
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyComputer scienceManagement scienceData scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This symposium will focus on Interpersonal synchrony, which refers to the coordination of neurological, physiological, and behavioral states between individuals. Extant research, across disciplines, has demonstrated the effects of these forms of synchrony on fostering positive affect, relationship-building, and other important aspects of communication that can impact work outcomes such as job satisfaction, group cohesion, and performance. In this symposium, we focus on the contribution of research on synchrony to management theory and research. We highlight how neural and physiological forms of synchrony capture deep-seated, instantaneous dynamics in work teams. Presenters will demonstrate the role of individual and group-related processes in facilitating synchrony and examine its role on individual and team outcomes. This symposium will advance the field by offering new directions for theorizing and guidelines for future research on team processes and outcomes. How consensus-building conversation changes our minds and aligns our brains Author: Beau Sievers; Harvard U. Author: Christopher Welker; Dartmouth College Author: Uri Hasson; Princeton U. Author: Adam M. Kleinbaum; Dartmouth College, Tuck School of Business Author: Thalia Wheatley; Dartmouth College The Effects of Justice and Group Outcomes: The Role of Physiological/Behavioral Synchrony Author: Nir Milstein; HEC Lausanne - UNIL Author: Gavin J. Kilduff; New York U. Author: Ilanit Gordon; Bar Ilan U. The Effects of Charismatic Leadership on Interpersonal Synchrony and Task Performance Author: Alon Burns; Bar Ilan U., Department of Psychology, Israel Author: Yair Berson; McMaster U. Author: Ilanit Gordon; Bar Ilan U. The Impact of Team Circadian Asynchrony on Team Creativity and the Role of Team Temporal Processes Author: Stefan Volk; U. Of Sydney Author: Yan Pan; Xi'an Jiaotong U. School of Management Author: Yufan Shang; Xi'an Jiaotong U. Author: Christopher Barnes; U. of Washington

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademy of Management ProceedingsSame topicAction Observation and SynchronizationFrench-language works237,207