MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385212603 · doi:10.5465/amproc.2023.55bp

Air Pollution Effect on Expatriate Assignments: An Interactive Perspective on MNEs and Expatriates

2023· article· en· W4385212603 on OpenAlexaff
Jae C. Jung, Duckjung Shin, Guoliang Frank Jiang, Maoliang Bu

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademy of Management Proceedings · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEnergy, Environment, Economic Growth
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExpatriateSubsidiaryMultinational corporationBusinessPollutionAir pollutionSoftware deploymentTransaction costChinaIndustrial organizationGeographyEngineeringFinanceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the devastating effects of air pollution on human health, it is still unknown how local air pollution affects multinational enterprises (MNEs) and their employees. Building upon the micro-foundation of Transaction Cost Economics (TCE), we propose expatriate deployment as an interactive contractual process between MNEs and expatriates. We contend that because local air pollution in the host country causes expatriate candidates’ reluctance to relocate, MNEs incur additional transaction costs in expatriate deployment. Our empirical analysis, using samples of Japanese-owned subsidiaries in China, shows that local air pollution in the host country negatively affects expatriate assignments in subsidiaries. We further find that the effect of air pollution is contingent on several external and internal factors. Specifically, the negative effect of local air pollution on expatriate assignments is mitigated when MNEs have more experience in the local environment. Yet, the negative effect of air pollution is more pronounced when MNEs belong to low-pollution industries and when local talent is the most available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademy of Management ProceedingsSame topicEnergy, Environment, Economic GrowthFrench-language works237,207