Two new species of Atopobathynella (Parabathynellidae, Bathynellacea) from the Pilbara region, Australia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fifteen species of the Gondwanan genus Atopobathynella have been described so far from four countries. The position of the genus within the family Parabathynellidae and its species relationships are controversial due to the different characters and species considered by different authors, however most of the phylogenetic reconstructions are based solely on morphological characters. In the past few decades, the arid zones of Western Australia, including the Pilbara region, have been recognized as a hotspot for subterranean fauna. Material is constantly collected to produce Environmental Impact Assessments to protect and manage the subterranean environment. In 2009 the Cleaverville Iron Formation, in the Pilbara region, northern Western Australia, was proposed to be mined, therefore subterranean fauna sampling was conducted as per legislation. Preliminary molecular studies of stygofauna identified two distinct Parabathynellidae lineages from two ridges, however no morphological descriptions were carried out at that time. In this study, we describe two new species from Yarrie and Callawa ridges, respectively: Atopobathynella yarriensis sp. nov. and A. degreyensis sp. nov.. The new species show differences in male antennal organ, ventral tooth of mandible, number of teeth on distal endite of maxillula, absence or presence of epipod of thoracopod I, number of setae on article 4 of thoracopod II, length of distal external seta of exopod of all thoracopods, outer lobe of male thoracopod VIII, number of spines on uropodal sympod and furcal rami, length of the external dorsal plumose seta of the furcal rami. Additionally, we integrated the morphological data with sequences of three genetic loci, Cytochrome Oxidase c Subunit I (COI), 12S rRNA (12S), and nuclear 18S rRNA (18S), calculating p-distances and constructing a multigene molecular phylogeny to support morphology, and explore the monophyletic status of the genus and the relationship amongst its species. The two new species were well supported in our phylogeny, however they appear distantly related.http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:2D8DA822-6C08-45B5-B707-6F63A1B69DE2
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".