MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Historical Embeddedness and Rhetorical Strategies: The Case of Medicare’s Enactment, 1957–1965

2023· article· en· W4385221933 on OpenAlexaff
Markus Kantola, Hannele Seeck, Albert J. Mills, Jean Helms Mills

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademy of Management Proceedings · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAcademic Freedom and Politics
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbeddednessRhetorical questionSociologyEpistemologyLinguisticsSocial sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explores the role of history and agency in new institutional theory (NIT). The themes of history and agency in NIT are examined through a case study of the use of rhetorical strategies in introducing Medicare in the United States (U.S.). The study is empirically grounded in archival research, involving an analysis of over 9,590 pages of congressional hearings on Medicare covering the period 1958–1965. In the process, the paper contributes to three major debates: the historic turn in management and organization studies (MOS); NIT and agency; and rhetoric and organizational legitimacy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademy of Management ProceedingsSame topicAcademic Freedom and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207