Towards deciphering glioblastoma intra‐tumoral heterogeneity: The importance of integrating multidimensional models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and severe form of brain cancer among adults. Its aggressiveness is largely attributed to its complex and heterogeneous biology that despite maximal surgery and multimodal chemoradiation treatment, inevitably recurs. Traditional large-scale profiling approaches have contributed substantially to the understanding of patient-to-patient inter-tumoral differences in GBM. However, it is now clear that biological differences within an individual (intra-tumoral heterogeneity) are also a prominent factor in treatment resistance and recurrence of GBM and will likely require integration of data from multiple recently developed omics platforms to fully unravel. Here we dissect the growing geospatial model of GBM, which layers intra-tumoral heterogeneity on a GBM stem cell (GSC) precursor, single cell, and spatial level. We discuss potential unique and inter-dependant aspects of the model including potential discordances between observed genotypes and phenotypes in GBM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".