Auditory and Vestibular Findings in Brazilian Adults Affected by COVID-19: An Exploratory Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to describe auditory and vestibular findings in Brazilian adults after COVID-19 in a municipality from the outskirts of the São Paulo state. METHODS: This was a transversal and exploratory study comprising sixteen participants infected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, confirmed through RT-PCR detection, aged 20 to 55 years. Subjects underwent anamnesis, vestibular and auditory testing. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate medication use, chemical and physical exposure, and occupational risk and McNemar test was used to compare auditory and vestibular symptoms pre- and post-COVID-19. RESULTS: Most patients were women (75%) and had been exposed to the virus over 90 days before testing (50%). 18.8% used hydroxychloroquine, 68.8% used ivermectin, and 87.5% used azithromycin to treat COVID-19. Auditory complaints were reported by 31.2% and vestibular by 18.7%. There was no statistical difference before and after the disease. Other reported symptomatology was hair loss, pain, fatigue, memory loss, difficulty to concentrate, and headache. Auditory findings were relevant in contralateral acoustic reflex, in the distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, and in the brainstem auditory evoked potential, characterizing a neurosensorial compromise. 43.74% of patients had altered vectonystagmography. When comparing both ears, no statistical relevance was found; however, when results were crossed with medication use and exposures, there was statistical relevance in the amplitude of the V wave for medications and absolute latency of the V wave to exposure to physical agents. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated auditory and vestibular findings of neurosensorial nature, considering hearing and of a peripheral vestibulopathy. As it is a study of transversal nature, it is not possible to extend results to general population; yet it may be a finding to future studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".