Knowledge-Induced Multiple Kernel Fuzzy Clustering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The introduction of domain knowledge opens new horizons to fuzzy clustering. Then knowledge-driven and data-driven fuzzy clustering methods come into being. To address the challenges of inadequate extraction mechanism and imperfect fusion mode in such class of methods, we propose the Knowledge-induced Multiple Kernel Fuzzy Clustering (KMKFC) algorithm. First, to extract knowledge points better, the Relative Density-based Knowledge Extraction (RDKE) method is proposed to extract high-density knowledge points close to cluster centers of real data structure, and provide initialized cluster centers. Moreover, the multiple kernel mechanism is introduced to improve the adaptability of clustering algorithm and map data to high-dimensional space, so as to better discover the differences between the data and obtain superior clustering results. Second, knowledge points generated by RDKE are integrated into KMKFC through a knowledge-influence matrix to guide the iterative process of KMKFC. Third, we also provide a strategy of automatically obtaining knowledge points, and thus propose the RDKE with Automatic knowledge acquisition (RDKE-A) method and the corresponding KMKFC-A algorithm. Then we prove the convergence of KMKFC and KMKFC-A. Finally, experimental studies demonstrate that the KMKFC and KMKFC-A algorithms perform better than thirteen comparison algorithms with regard to four evaluation indexes and the convergence speed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".