MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385232734 · doi:10.3389/frym.2023.1023547

Animals Helping Animals: How Dog Detectives Can Help Save Endangered Species

2023· article· en· W4385232734 on OpenAlexaff
Hannah Burrows, Maeve K. McCreary, Montana J. Shore, Sylvia G. V. Pinheiro, Valerie A. Kuhlmeier

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers for Young Minds · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHuman-Animal Interaction Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndangered speciesWork (physics)ZoologyBiologyEcologyEngineeringHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dogs are working alongside humans to help protect animals in the wild that are endangered. People who work in the field of animal conservation can train dogs to use their powerful noses to sniff out where certain endangered species have been. Dogs help their human handlers by finding the scat (poop!) that members of an endangered species have left behind. Scat contains important information about these species that help us preserve their populations. In this article, you will learn why some animals are endangered, why studying scat is so important, and how teams of dogs and humans can work together to find scat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.236
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers for Young MindsSame topicHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesFrench-language works237,207