MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Impact of the Front Vehicle on the Propagation Loss of ETC System

2023· preprint· en· W4385233501 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoyu Li, Wenbo Zeng, Huawei Liang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNon-line-of-sight propagationPath lossLine-of-sightRay tracing (physics)SightFront (military)SimulationTransmission lossComputer scienceTransmission lineTransmission (telecommunications)EngineeringTelecommunicationsOpticsAerospace engineeringPhysicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the actual traffic environment, there usually exists more than one vehicle in the radiation area of the road-side units (RSU) at the same time, and the front vehicle will affect the ray paths between the RSU and the on-board units (OBU) of the back vehicle. Here we studied the front vehicle’s impact on the ETC system’s path propagation loss by ray tracing technology and Uniform Theory of Diffraction (UTD). Firstly, we simplified the vehicle body structure into two equivalent geometric models. We analyzed propagation loss models under line-of-sight (LOS) and non-line-of-sight (NLOS) conditions based on the distance change among RSU, OBU, and the front vehicle. Finally, a set of ETC comprehensive testing equipment was developed to measure the transmission loss of toll stations. Both simulation and experiment results indicate that the propagation loss models proposed in this letter are valid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and ModelingFrench-language works237,207