MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Convolutional Neural Network for Estimation of Lithium-Ion Battery State-of-Health during Constant Current Operation

2023· article· en· W4385236460 on OpenAlexaff
Junran Chen, Manjula Manivanan, Josimar Duque, Phillip J. Kollmeyer, Satyam Panchal, Oliver Groß, Ali Emadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattery (electricity)Constant currentConvolutional neural networkComputer scienceArtificial neural networkState of healthConstant (computer programming)Lithium-ion batteryArtificial intelligenceCurrent (fluid)Electrical engineeringEngineeringPhysicsPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate state-of-health (SOH) estimation is critical for lithium-ion batteries' safe and reliable operation. These batteries are widely used for commercial products, including smartphones, laptops, and electric vehicles. In this paper, we develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) based battery SOH estimation model trained to estimate SOH from constant current charge and discharge data. Aging data from four cells, each charged with a different fifteen-minute fast-charging current profile, is used to train and test the SOH estimation model. The model's accuracy is demonstrated by training with data from one fast-charging aging case and tested using the other three cases, which age at a considerably different rate. The results show that the method is quite robust when the tested cells have more than 80% SOH, with error typically within <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\pm \mathbf{2}{\%}$</tex> and not exceeding <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\pm \mathbf{3}{\%}$</tex> . However, the proposed method has limitations when trying to predict battery health below 80% or when trying to predict battery health from curves with different C-rates. The datasets and the code for the algorithm in this paper are available to download.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.387
Threshold uncertainty score0.360

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207