MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385246262 · doi:10.1109/tim.2023.3298680

Three-Dimensional Source Localization Based on 1-D AOA Measurements: Low-Complexity and Effective Estimator

2023· article· en· W4385246262 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yonghua Chen, Hua Yu, Jie Li, Qisen Wang, Fei Ji, Fangjiong Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaMinistry of Natural Resources
KeywordsEstimatorCramér–Rao boundAlgorithmComputer scienceComputational complexity theoryMathematical optimizationUpper and lower boundsAngle of arrivalConvergence (economics)Regularization (linguistics)Estimation theoryMathematicsArtificial intelligenceStatisticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three-dimensional (3-D) source localization based on 1-D angles of arrival (AOA) measurements from multiple linear arrays have attracted much attention due to the low cost of linear arrays and the easy access to 1-D AOAs. However, most existing methods are restricted to specific array deployments, and the convex optimization methods applicable to the linear array with arbitrary deployments have drawbacks such as high computational complexity and nonportability to small industrial equipment. In this article, we propose two 1-D AOA-based source localization methods. The first method uses the iterative reweighted least square (IRLS) to obtain a coarse solution and a deviation refinement (DR) procedure to refine the estimation. Each step in IRLS-DR has a closed-form solution; thus, it is computationally efficient. Moreover, it applies to arbitrary interarray deployments, and theoretical analysis shows that its performance can approach the Cramér–Rao lower bound (CRLB) at small noise levels. The second method addresses the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE). A modified Levenberg–Marquardt (MLM) method is proposed, which focuses on designing a new selection strategy of the regularization parameter to realize a high convergence probability and localization accuracy. Experiments based on computer simulations and SWellEx96-S59 ocean acoustic measurements are carried out to verify the performance and advantages of the proposed methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.920

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementSame topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207