Nonlinear radiation effects on water-based nanofluid containing CNTs subject to heat source/ sink past a wedge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a two-dimensional and incompressible laminar flow comprised of water-based carbon nanotubes over convectively heated moving wedge under the magnetic field and nonlinear radiation and heat production/ absorption is investigated. The base nanofluid (water) contains single wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and multiple walls carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). In order to convert the dimensional nonlinear partial differential equations in nondimensional nonlinear ordinary differential form, an adequate set of similarity variables had been used. These set of equations and boundary conditions are evaluated by the implementation of RKF-45 (Runge–Kutta–Fehlberg fourth-fifth) order scheme. The influence of several physical parameters on particular nanoparticle’s volume friction, temperature and velocity ratio parameter, heat source/ sink parameter, nonlinear radiative constraint, exponent constant, magnetic factor, Eckert and Biot numbers is studied. An opposite behavior of volume fraction and velocity ratio parameters on velocity and energy profiles is achieved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".