MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385249211 · doi:10.55849/ijen.v1i4.382

Analysis of Children’s Numeracy Skills in The Village Pagar Dewa Kaur with Math Approach Realistic

2023· article· en· W4385249211 on OpenAlexaff
Jessica Adelia Saputri, Resti Komala Sari, Uwe Barroso, Eladdadi Mark

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Educational Narratives · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematics Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNumeracyMathematics educationTest (biology)CurriculumFactor (programming language)MathematicsPsychologyPedagogyComputer scienceLiteracy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. The relevance of math materials to children's daily lives is an important factor in the success of this approach. Purpose. This study aims to analyze the counting ability of children in Pagar Dewa Village Kaur with Realistic Mathematics approach. Method. The research sample consisted of 30 children aged 6-8 years. Data was collected through counting ability test and observation. Results. he results showed that most of the children in Pagar Dewa Village Kaur had low counting skills. However, after learning with the Realistic Mathematics approach, there was a significant increase in children's understanding and application of mathematical concepts. Conclusion. This study provides recommendations for educators and curriculum developers to apply the Realistic Mathematics approach in children's mathematics learning in rural areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Educational NarrativesSame topicMathematics Education and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207