MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Structural Design Evaluation of Integrated Rotor Hub and Shaft for a High-Speed Surface Mounted Radial Flux Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor

2023· article· en· W4385249843 on OpenAlexaff
Akshay Manikandan, Mohamed Abdalmagid, Giorgio Pietrini, Mikhail Goykhman, Ali Emadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersEaton Corporation
KeywordsMagnetSynchronous motorRotor (electric)Permanent magnet synchronous motorPermanent magnet synchronous generatorAC motorFlux (metallurgy)Magnetic fluxEngineeringMechanical engineeringAutomotive engineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsMaterials scienceElectric motorMagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increasing the reliability and power density of a surface-mounted permanent magnet synchronous machine (SPMSM) is crucial due to the broader applications in the automotive and aerospace sectors. Concerns with such machines are that the overall rotating assembly experiences significant mechanical loads due to the rapid rotational speeds, making it exceptionally challenging to design the structural integrity of these components. This study's main objective is to offer a scientific justification for designing an integrated rotor hub and shaft through efficient Finite Element Modeling (FEM) and integration strategies to maximize the rotating assembly durability of a 150kW radial flux SPMSM spinning at 20,000 rpm. The optimization of integrated topology is evaluated based on a multiphysics platform, along with studies conducted on motor assembly eigen frequency. The integrated approach combining the shaft and rotor hub made of AISI 4340 solely saves 1.84kg, removing the necessity of standard components such as balancing end clamp plates, locknuts, and washers. Lower masses are proportional to lower centrifugal forces, reducing radial stress and promoting component/assembly stiffness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207