Autoencoder-transformed transcriptome improves genotype-phenotype association studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) is an emerging model leveraging gene expressions to direct genotype-phenotype association mapping. A key component in TWAS is the prediction of gene expressions; and many statistical approaches have been developed along this line. However, a problem is that many genes have low expression heritability, limiting the performance of any predictive model. In this work, hypothesizing that appropriate denoising may improve the quality of expression data (including heritability), we propose AE-TWAS, which adds a transformation step before conducting standard TWAS. The transformation is composed of two steps by first splitting the whole transcriptome into co-expression networks (modules) and then using autoencoder (AE) to reconstruct the transcriptome data within each module. This transformation removes noise (including nonlinear ones) from the transcriptome data, paving the path for downstream TWAS. We showed two inspiring properties of AE-TWAS: (1) After transformation, the transcriptome data enjoy higher expression heritability at the low-heritability spectrum and possess higher connectivity within the modules. (2) The transferred transcriptome indeed enables better performance of TWAS; and moreover, the newly formed highly connected genes (i.e., hub genes) are more functionally relevant to diseases, evidenced by their functional annotations and overlap with TWAS hits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".