Análise dos discursos das propostas legislativas de alteração da Política Nacional do Saneamento Básico
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Propôs-se analisar os discursos proferidos por dois Deputados Federais e dois Senadores que foram favoráveis às alterações impostas pela Lei nº 14.026/2020 na Política Nacional de Saneamento Básico. Adotou-se a Análise de Discurso Crítica, proposta por Fairclough, em diálogo com o pensamento de Dardot e Laval, Harvey e Brown com o objetivo de identificar as representações constituídas e as ideologias que permearam os discursos desses parlamentares, em prol da ampliação do número de empresas privadas na prestação dos serviços de abastecimento de água e de esgotamento sanitário. Os achados dão conta que nos discursos analisados foram construídas representações ideológicas neoliberais com objetivo de desqualificar as Companhias Estaduais, silenciando a importância dessas instituições públicas na ampliação e provisão dos serviços públicos de abastecimento de água e de esgotamento sanitário, no Brasil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".