The Evolving Spectrum of Endometrial Glandular Proliferations With Corded and Hyalinized Features
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present the clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features of 14 endometrial glandular proliferations with conspicuous corded and hyalinized (CH) features comprised entirely or predominantly of endometrial hyperplasia. Endometrial glandular lesions ranged in severity from endometrial hyperplasia with and without cytologic atypia (5/14 [36%]) to hyperplasia with architectural complexity bordering on well-differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma (3/14 [21%]) to frank corded and hyalinized endometrial carcinoma ("CHEC") (6/14 [43%]). In addition to sex cord-like growth and hyalinized stroma, other common histologic features included prominent spindle cells (11/14 [79%]), keratinizing and/or morular squamous differentiation (10/14 [71%]), and osseous metaplasia (6/14 [43%]). Immunohistochemical characterization revealed aberrant nuclear beta-catenin in all cases (14/14 [100%]); additionally, all cases demonstrated positive estrogen receptors, intact PTEN, PMS2 and MSH6, and wild-type p53 expression. Patients ranged in age from 24 to 58 (mean 38) years. Of 5 patients with hyperplasia with CH features, 2 experienced complete resolution after progestin therapy and none progressed to adenocarcinoma (mean follow-up 15.6 mo, range 2 to 64). By contrast, of 2 patients with hyperplasia bordering on CHEC and with available follow-up, both subsequently developed adenocarcinoma, suggesting that even focal increased architectural complexity may predict an elevated risk of malignancy. We conclude that CH morphology is not limited to endometrioid carcinoma and may occur across a spectrum of neoplastic proliferations, including those without sufficient architectural complexity or cytologic atypia to warrant classification as adenocarcinoma. We propose the term "corded and hyalinized endometrial hyperplasia" to describe this precursor lesion and report favorable outcomes with conservative treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".