MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385268508 · doi:10.33011/newlibs/14/5

On the Clock

2023· article· en· W4385268508 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of New Librarianship · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLibrary Science and Administration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersKorea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement
KeywordsConversationTask (project management)Work (physics)Service (business)Balance (ability)Column (typography)Public relationsSociologyLibrary sciencePolitical sciencePsychologyComputer scienceManagementEngineeringTelecommunicationsBusinessMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This short column will be a discussion of what is expected of librarians versus what they are given time to do, from the unique perspectives of an Academic Cataloguing Librarian and a rural Public Librarian. As new librarians themselves, they will discuss the challenges of librarianship across disciplines. “I’ll do it on the clock” means the task will be completed when one is being paid for their efforts. Yet when “this needs to be done,” it doesn’t matter what the clock says. They will discuss their day-to-day tasks, as well as their commitments like service and publication, to engage with the well-established conversation of work-life balance in a profession known for giving as much as it takes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score0.905

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.141
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it