Deep learning assisted quality ranking for list decoding of videos subject to transmission errors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a new deep learning-based quality ranking framework to assist video list decoding methods in the context of unreliable video transmissions. The objective is to identify an intact image (corrected video frame) among a list of candidate images generated by a list decoding method, where all candidates, except for the intact image are corrupted. The framework comprises a deep learning-based no-reference image quality assessment (NR-IQA) for non-uniform video distortions (NUD) system to rank the candidate images according to their quality, which allows identifying the best one. To show the validity of our proposed framework, we develop an NR-IQA system relying on a proven patch-based convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture, which we adapt to better account for the non-uniform distortions observed in the candidate images, e.g., H.265 transmission errors during wireless communications. Specifically, we modify the patch size on which our CNN for non-uniform distortions (CNN-NUD) operates to capture a larger and more meaningful spatial context. Moreover, we develop a new training database using images resulting from various bit modifications in the received video packets, to simulate the list decoding process, and train the system using a full reference IQA (FR-IQA) method. Experiments on intra frames of videos encoded using H.265 show the ability of this system to identify an intact image among a set of five candidate images with an average accuracy of 96.6%, whereas traditional NR-IQA metrics or the initially trained CNN system offer poor accuracy ranging between 15.7% and 33.6%, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".