The Impact of Processing Methods and Levels of Jatropha gossypifolia L. Leaves on Productivity of Goats, Considering Distance
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jatropha gossypifolia L. is a critical source of feed ingredients for livestock, providing 60% protein with a proper balance of essential amino acids when appropriately processed.This study aimed to evaluate the production performance, physiological status, and haematological value of Nuts goats fed with jatropha leaves processed using different methods and levels.Thirty local female goats of 10 months old with a weight range of 10.89kg to 18.98kg were used.The research employed a 2×5 factorial randomized block design and was repeated three times.The analysis revealed an interaction between the processing method and the level of red jatropha leaves given to obtain body weight gain, consumption of dry matter, and crude protein ration.The processing method of red jatropha leaves had a significant impact on the consumption of dry matter and crude protein ration, body temperature, pulsus frequency, and hematological value (white blood cell count, red blood cell count, hemoglobin level, hematocrit value) of the goats.However, it did not affect the efficiency of using dry ingredients, protein rations, and the frequency of respiration of nuts goats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it