DETECTING LOW BACK PHYSIOTHERAPY EXERCISES AND POSTURES WITH INERTIAL SENSORS AND MACHINE LEARNING
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Physiotherapy is a critical element in successful conservative management of low back pain (LBP). The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a system with wearable inertial sensors to objectively detect sitting postures and performance of unsupervised exercises containing movement in multiple planes (flexion, extension, rotation). A set of 8 inertial sensors were placed on 19 healthy adult subjects. Data was acquired as they performed 7 McKenzie low-back exercises and 3 sitting posture positions. This data was used to train two models (Random Forest (RF) and XGBoost (XGB)) using engineered time series features. In addition, a convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained directly on the time series data. A feature importance analysis was performed to identify sensor locations and channels that contributed most to the models. Finally, a subset of sensor locations and channels was included in a hyperparameter grid search to identify the optimal sensor configuration and the best performing algorithm(s) for exercise classification. Models were evaluated using F1-score in a 10-fold cross validation approach. The optimal hardware configuration was identified as a 3-sensor setup using lower back, left thigh, and right ankle sensors with acceleration, gyroscope, and magnetometer channels. The XBG model achieved the highest exercise (F1=0.94±0.03) and posture (F1=0.90±0.11) classification scores. The CNN achieved similar results with the same sensor locations, using only the accelerometer and gyroscope channels for exercise classification (F1=0.94±0.02) and the accelerometer channel alone for posture classification (F1=0.91±0.03). This study demonstrates the potential of a 3-sensor lower body wearable solution (e.g. smart pants) that can identify proper sitting postures and exercises in multiple planes, suitable for low back pain. This technology has the potential to improve the effectiveness of LBP rehabilitation by facilitating quantitative feedback, early problem diagnosis, and possible remote monitoring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".