LA NACS COM A INSTITUCIÓ DINAMITZADORA DEL ESTUDIS DE CATALANISTICA: REVISIÓ DEL PASSAT I EL PRESENT AMB LA MIRADA CAP AL FUTUR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
From its foundation in 1978, the North American Catalan Society (NACS) was committed to promoting Catalan studies in North America while establishing connections with academic institutions in Catalan speaking countries. This first group of professors fostered collaboration among NACS members in different geographical areas and this interconnection resulted in fruitful collaborations among university scholars and doctoral students from the United States, Canada, Catalonia, Valencia and the Balearic Islands. The founders also established collaborative agreements with Catalan institutions like the Institut d’Estudis Catalans (IEC) and the Institut Ramon Llull (IRL). Since 1978, those at the helm of the NACS have renewed these agreements, establishing grants to promote the study of Catalan language and culture, and celebrating regular colloquia and symposia at the IEC. The article proposes that future plans should include promoting and disseminating more effectively scholarly studies and publications, and establishing more collaborations among research groups in universities in North America and Catalanspeaking countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".