An Analysis of the Canadian Military-Naval Industry in the Period 2010-2018
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canadian military naval industry has historically suffered from cycles of high investment during periods of conflict and cuts in peacetime. After years of scrapping, the government turned to the sector through the initiative of the National Shipbuilding Strategy (2010), which is an ambitious attempt to modernize the navy. Taking this scenario into account, the main purpose of this paper is to understand the role of the State as a promoter of the interactions between the relevant actors and the rules of this industry. To do so, the analysis will be based on the Structure-Conduct-Performance (SCP) paradigm, allowing a better understanding of the dynamics of the industry and a clearer identification of its important variables. Setting up a case study, this research uses official data, documents, reports and academic papers. the time frame covers the period 2010-2018, due to the launch of the Canadian shipbuilding strategy, which is a milestone for the revitalization and operation of the Canadian naval industry. This policy changed the components of the country’s military naval industry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".