MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385285628 · doi:10.1088/1361-6579/acead2

The 2023 wearable photoplethysmography roadmap

2023· review· en· W4385285628 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiological Measurement · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsTed Rogers Centre for Heart ResearchUniversity of Toronto
FundersLietuvos Mokslo TarybaNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNIHR Oxford Biomedical Research CentreEuropean Regional Development FundNational Research FoundationInstituto de Salud Carlos IIINational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Research Foundation of KoreaRoyal Academy of EngineeringBritish Heart FoundationUniversity of TorontoJapan Agency for Medical Research and DevelopmentInnovation and Technology CommissionMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónKorea Health Industry Development InstituteNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchMultidisciplinary University Research InitiativeEuropean Cooperation in Science and TechnologyNational Institutes of HealthEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilUK Research and InnovationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhotoplethysmogramWearable computerWearable technologySmartwatchKey (lock)Computer scienceActivity trackerEmbedded systemWirelessTelecommunicationsComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photoplethysmography is a key sensing technology which is used in wearable devices such as smartwatches and fitness trackers. Currently, photoplethysmography sensors are used to monitor physiological parameters including heart rate and heart rhythm, and to track activities like sleep and exercise. Yet, wearable photoplethysmography has potential to provide much more information on health and wellbeing, which could inform clinical decision making. This Roadmap outlines directions for research and development to realise the full potential of wearable photoplethysmography. Experts discuss key topics within the areas of sensor design, signal processing, clinical applications, and research directions. Their perspectives provide valuable guidance to researchers developing wearable photoplethysmography technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.197
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.114 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it