MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385285628 · doi:10.1088/1361-6579/acead2

The 2023 wearable photoplethysmography roadmap

2023· review· en· W4385285628 on OpenAlexafffund
Peter Charlton, John Allen, Raquel Bailón, Stephanie Baker, Joachim A. Behar, Fei Chen, Gari D. Clifford, David A. Clifton, Harry J. Davies, Cheng Ding, Xiaorong Ding, Jessilyn Dunn, Mohamed Elgendi, Munia Ferdoushi, Daniel Franklin, Eduardo Gil, Md. Farhad Hassan, Jussi Hernesniemi, Xiao Hu, Nan Ji, Yasser Khan, Spyridon Kontaxis, Ilkka Korhonen, P. A. Kyriacou, Pablo Laguna, Jesús Lázaro, Chungkeun Lee, Jeremy Levy, Yumin Li, Chengyu Liu, Jing Liu, Lei Lü, Danilo P. Mandic, Vaidotas Marozas, Elisa Mejía‐Mejía, Ramakrishna Mukkamala, Meir Nitzan, Tânia Pereira, Carmen C. Y. Poon, Jessica C. Ramella‐Roman, Harri Juhani Saarinen, Md Mobashir Hasan Shandhi, Hang‐Sik Shin, Gerard Stansby, T. Tamura, Antti Vehkaoja, Will Ke Wang, Yuan‐Ting Zhang, Ni Zhao, Dingchang Zheng, Tingting Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiological Measurement · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsTed Rogers Centre for Heart ResearchUniversity of Toronto
FundersLietuvos Mokslo TarybaNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNIHR Oxford Biomedical Research CentreEuropean Regional Development FundNational Research FoundationInstituto de Salud Carlos IIINational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Research Foundation of KoreaRoyal Academy of EngineeringBritish Heart FoundationUniversity of TorontoJapan Agency for Medical Research and DevelopmentInnovation and Technology CommissionMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónKorea Health Industry Development InstituteNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchMultidisciplinary University Research InitiativeEuropean Cooperation in Science and TechnologyNational Institutes of HealthEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilUK Research and InnovationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhotoplethysmogramWearable computerWearable technologySmartwatchKey (lock)Computer scienceActivity trackerEmbedded systemWirelessTelecommunicationsComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photoplethysmography is a key sensing technology which is used in wearable devices such as smartwatches and fitness trackers. Currently, photoplethysmography sensors are used to monitor physiological parameters including heart rate and heart rhythm, and to track activities like sleep and exercise. Yet, wearable photoplethysmography has potential to provide much more information on health and wellbeing, which could inform clinical decision making. This Roadmap outlines directions for research and development to realise the full potential of wearable photoplethysmography. Experts discuss key topics within the areas of sensor design, signal processing, clinical applications, and research directions. Their perspectives provide valuable guidance to researchers developing wearable photoplethysmography technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.197
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.114 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations145
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiological MeasurementSame topicNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringFrench-language works237,207