MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385297038 · doi:10.28924/2291-8639-21-2023-73

New Fixed Point Results in Neutrosophic b-Metric Spaces With Application

2023· article· en· W4385297038 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Analysis and Applications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFixed Point Theorems Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsMetric spaceGeneralizationContraction (grammar)Pure mathematicsMetric mapMetric (unit)T-normDiscrete mathematicsFixed-point theoremFuzzy logicAlgebra over a fieldConvex metric spaceFuzzy setFuzzy numberComputer scienceMathematical analysisArtificial intelligenceLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this manuscript, we establish the notion of neutrosophic b-metric spaces as a generalization of fuzzy b-metric spaces, intuitionistic fuzzy b-metric spaces and neutrosophic metric spaces in which three symmetric properties plays an important role for membership, non-membership and neutral functions as well we derive some common fixed point and coincident point results for contraction mappings. Also, we provide several non-trivial examples with graphical views of neutrosophic b-metric spaces and contraction mappings by using computational techniques. Our results are more generalized with respect to the existing ones in the literature. At the end of the paper, we provide an application to test the validity of the main result.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.703
Threshold uncertainty score0.419

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it