Treatment of cervical dystonia with Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA): Development, insights, and impact
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cervical dystonia (CD), the most common focal dystonia encountered in neurologic practice, is a chronic disorder in which the muscles of the neck involuntarily contract and cause abnormal postures and movements of the head, neck, and shoulders. Treatment of CD prior to botulinum toxin was unsatisfactory, as existing therapies often did not improve symptoms. The use of botulinum toxin for CD grew out of its success in treating blepharospasm, another type of focal dystonia. On the basis of results from a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, onabotulinumtoxinA was approved in 2000 in the US for the treatment of CD in adults in order to alleviate abnormal head position and neck pain. A subsequent large observational trial further demonstrated the effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA for CD, showing improvements in various rating scales, physician-reported measures, and profound positive effects on patient quality of life, including in amelioration of pain and improvements in work productivity. In addition, onabotulinumtoxinA treatment also reduced the complications of CD, as patients no longer develop contractures (permanent muscle and tendon shortening from prolonged untreated dystonia), which markedly limited the range of neck motion. The onset of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment also accompanied advances in understanding the functional anatomy of neck muscles, basal ganglia physiology, and video and other recording technology. Following the success of onabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of CD, its use has been expanded into numerous other therapeutic indications, and these advances stimulated educational and training programs by various neurologic and other medical societies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".