Vehicle Check-In Data-driven POI Recommendation Based on Improved SVD and Graph Convolutional Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The application of automobile tool software is becoming increasingly widespread, and its functions are becoming increasingly diverse. Using vehicle traffic data to give users with recommendations for Points-of-interest (POI) is becoming an intriguing research challenge. However, the current POI recommendation is either a sequence-based method, ignoring the interaction information between users and POIs. Or it needs a lot of model training time to use graph correlation method to mine the interaction between users or vehicles and POIs. In order to address these issues, we propose a method for vehicle check-in data-driven POI recommendation based on improved Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) and Graph Convolutional Network (GCN). First, we apply SVD to replace the neighborhood aggregation update method in traditional GCN, update the node embedding with fewer parameters and faster speed. Second, we propose an information enhancement strategy to make up for the information loss caused by the SVD. Experiments on large vehicle check-in datasets demonstrate that our method is both faster and more effective when making POI recommendations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".