Large-scale heterogeneities can alter the characteristics of compressive failure and accelerated seismic release
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Externally stressed brittle rocks fail once the stress is sufficiently high. This failure is typically preceded by a pronounced increase in the total energy of acoustic emission (AE) events, the so-called accelerated seismic release. Yet, other characteristics of approaching the failure point such as the presence or absence of variations in the AE size distribution and, similarly, whether the failure point can be interpreted as a critical point in a statistical physics sense differs across experiments. Here, we show that large-scale stress heterogeneities induced by a notch fundamentally change the characteristics of the failure point in triaxial compression experiments under a constant displacement rate on Westerly granite samples. Specifically, we observe accelerated seismic release without a critical point and no change in power-law exponent ε of the AE size distribution. This is in contrast to intact samples, which exhibit a significant decrease in ε before failure. Our findings imply that the presence or absence of large-scale heterogeneities play a significant role in our ability to predict compressive failure in rock.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".