MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385303790 · doi:10.18280/acsm.470301

Effect of Graphite on Mechanical and Tribological Properties of Al6061/SiC Hybrid Composites

2023· article· fr· W4385303790 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Siva Sankara Babu Chinka, M. Vijaya, Sneha H. Dhoria, Deva Raj Chilakala, Ranga Raya Chowdary Jarubula, Praveen Kumar Kancharla

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de Chimie Science des Matériaux · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicAluminum Alloys Composites Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComposite materialMaterials scienceGraphiteTribologyComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates the effects of incorporating graphite into a Al6061/SiC hybrid metal matrix composite on its mechanical and wear properties.The composites are fabricated using a stir casting technique, with SiC and Graphite particles added in different weight percentages ranging from 2-8%.Mechanical properties such as hardness, tensile strength, flexural strength, and compressive strength are evaluated.Results show that the composite with 6 wt.% of hybrid reinforcement exhibits significant improvement in hardness (30%), tensile strength (10.82%), compressive strength (68.14%), and flexural strength (85%) compared to pure Al6061 alloy.Furthermore, a wear test is performed using a pin-on-disc machine under dry conditions to assess the influence of parameters on the wear rate and coefficient of friction (COF).Tests are conducted at various loads (1-3 kgf), sliding speeds (150-450 rpm), and sliding distances (1000-2000 m).Among all reinforcements, the composite with 6% hybrid reinforcement exhibits the lowest wear rate and COF.Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the mechanical and wear properties of Al6061/SiC/graphite hybrid composites and highlights their potential for various industrial applications.These findings may pave the way for further research in the field of metal matrix composites and their applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de Chimie Science des MatériauxSame topicAluminum Alloys Composites PropertiesFrench-language works237,207