MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385306016 · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1174195

Psychiatric manifestations of Kleefstra syndrome: a case report

2023· article· en· W4385306016 on OpenAlexafffund
Kazunari Yoshida, Daniel J. Müller, Pushpal Desarkar

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Psychiatry · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Rare Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthHealth Canada
FundersDepartment of Psychiatry, University of TorontoUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsPsychiatryIntellectual disabilityAutism spectrum disorderAutismSleep disorderMedicinePsychologyClinical psychologyInsomnia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Kleefstra syndrome is a rare genetic condition, which affects at least 1 in 120,000 individuals who have a neurodevelopmental disorder, characterized by the core clinical phenotype of intellectual disability, hypotonia, severe speech delay, and distinct facial characteristics with additional clinical features including sleep disturbance, overweight, psychiatric disorders, and autism spectrum disorder. To date, a limited number of case reports of Kleefstra syndrome with psychiatric manifestations have been reported. Case presentation: We reported a case of a 35-year-old male diagnosed with Kleefstra syndrome, who also had diagnoses of autism spectrum disorder and moderate to severe intellectual disability. He exhibited various psychiatric manifestations, including temporarily manic-like symptoms, excessive eating/overweight, addictive/gambling behaviors, inappropriate and unsafe internet use, sleep disturbance, rigid routines, and behaviors that challenged in the form of meltdowns. These symptoms were eventually relatively successfully managed with a combination of non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments. Conclusion: To our knowledge, there is only a limited number of case reports that detail patients with Kleefstra syndrome exhibiting various psychiatric manifestations. Our report adds further knowledge to the paucity of literature and highlights the effectiveness of a combination of non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments for behavioral/psychiatric difficulties in Kleefstra syndrome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PsychiatrySame topicGenomics and Rare DiseasesFrench-language works237,207