MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385307930 · doi:10.22323/1.444.1053

Pacific Ocean Neutrino Experiment: Expected performance of the first cluster of strings

2023· article· en· W4385307930 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Felix Henningsen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNarodowym Centrum NaukiEuropean CommissionCanada First Research Excellence FundNational Science Foundation
KeywordsDetectorNeutrinoNeutrino detectorDeep seaSea trialOcean observationsEvent (particle physics)CalibrationPhysicsRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyOceanographyNeutrino oscillationGeographyGeologyParticle physicsOpticsAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Pacific Ocean Neutrino Experiment (P-ONE) is a proposed large-volume neutrino telescope in the Northeast Pacific Ocean, off the coast of Vancouver Island, Canada. With more than one cubic-kilometer of instrumented deep sea volume, P-ONE will target measuring high-energy neutrinos to shed light on the nature of astrophysical accelerators and the cosmos. With low expected scattering in the deep ocean, water-based detectors theoretically allow for sub-degree event resolution but carry various challenges. With changing ocean currents, and an abundance of organic matter, the detector geometry, water optical properties, and bioluminescent light background vary with time. This dynamic environment of the deep ocean requires rugged detector technologies and multiple, precise calibration and monitoring systems in order to enable and maintain the detector’s full scientific potential. In cooperation with Ocean Networks Canada (ONC), the P-ONE collaboration aims to develop long-lived, deep-sea detector systems which target continuous and precise monitoring to overcome these challenges. The first mooring of P-ONE will be deployed between 2024 and 2025, and will provide first insights into the performance of the developed detector systems. Following this first step, this work summarizes the ongoing efforts of the P-ONE collaboration targeting the development, simulation and operation of the first cluster of strings, and will present the expected performance of the calibration systems and physics potential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant NetworksFrench-language works237,207