MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385309842 · doi:10.5014/ajot.2023.77s2-po216

TikTok & Its Role in OT Promotion, Best Practice, & Innovation

2023· article· en· W4385309842 on OpenAlexaff
Skye Barbic, Marco Zenone, Whitney Chasca, Samantha Nerada

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSubtitles and Audiovisual Media
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPromotion (chess)Value (mathematics)Best practiceBusinessPsychologyManagementPolitical scienceComputer scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Date Presented 04/21/2023 TikTok has the potential to be used by OT to share innovations and best practices, build communities of practice, and engage in collaborative efforts to share the value added of the profession across the life span. The purpose of this cross-sectional study is to describe the content of TikTok videos with the hashtag #occupationaltherapy and investigate how OT is being portrayed. Primary Author and Speaker: Skye Pamela Barbic Additional Authors and Speakers: Whitney Chasca, Samantha Barbic Nerada Contributing Authors: Marco Zenone

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.162
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Occupational TherapySame topicSubtitles and Audiovisual MediaFrench-language works237,207