MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385321358 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.180301

Numerical Assessment of EAHE Systems for Refreshment in Desert Algerian Regions

2023· article· en· W4385321358 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCivil and Structural Engineering Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDesert (philosophy)EngineeringGeographyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As an example of green energy (geothermal energy), which has been the subject of advanced research in recent decades, the earth-to-air heat exchanger (EAHE) is the application of an air heat exchanger to soil temperatures, in which air circulates in tubes in thermal contact with the ground.The performance of the EAHE cooling system is evaluated at two separate sites (arid and semi-arid) in Algeria throughout this investigation.The impact of the EAHE system's entombed depth is then considered in this paper.According to our earlier research, the proper depth of the inhumed pipes is set at 3 m.The thermo-physical properties of the soil at several sites located in southern Algeria (Ghardaia: 32° 22′ 54′′ North, 3° 47′ 58′′ East) and Ouargla: 31° 55′ 53′′ North, 5° 24′ 24′′ East) are implemented by writing a program with the Scilab 6.0.2 software.Based on the results obtained, it can be concluded that the thermal range parameter is a more relevant and efficient parameter for evaluating the thermal performance of the EAHE (Earth-to-Air Heat Exchanger) system.Furthermore, the Ouargla region is a suitable location for the experimental realization of the EAHE system.The thermal amplitude interval (Trange) in Ouargla during the annual period is larger compared to Ghardaï a, with maximum values of 22.5℃ and 20℃ respectively.It is worth noting that the thermal comfort level (20-27℃) is more suitable for the Ouargla region rather than Ghardaï a. Additionally, there is an average difference of around 2.5℃ in the thermal amplitude between the two zones during the hot season, further highlighting the superiority of the Ouargla region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.429
Threshold uncertainty score0.275

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it