MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385324122 · doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100488

Unequal urban heat burdens impede climate justice and equity goals

2023· review· en· W4385324122 on OpenAlexafffund
Hui Zhang, Ming Luo, Tao Pei, Xiaoping Liu, Lin Wang, Wei Zhang, Lijie Lin, Erjia Ge, Zhen Liu, Weilin Liao

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Innovation · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of TorontoState Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information SystemNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEquity (law)Climate justiceEconomic JusticeEnvironmental justiceClimate changePublic economicsBusinessEconomicsPolitical scienceLawEcologyMicroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extreme heat is among the deadliest of weather-related hazards, exerting far-reaching impacts on the natural environment and human society globally. Its risk has been rising worldwide over the past decades, particularly in densely populated urban settlements in which more than half the world’s population live.1,2 This rise is primarily attributed to anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, of which the dominant share is contributed by the Global North.1 The Global North comprises economically developed countries with higher levels of industrialization, technology, infrastructures, energy consumption, and GHG emissions (e.g., North America and West Europe) whose cities are major emission hotspots.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.297
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations69
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe InnovationSame topicClimate Change and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207