Recent progress in regenerative therapy for damaged salivary glands: From bench to bedside
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: For functional restoration of salivary glands (SGs) injured by radiation therapy or Sjögren's syndrome (SS), various experimental approaches, such as gene therapy, tissue engineering, and cell-based therapy, have been proposed. This narrative review summarized recent progresses in research using cell-based therapies, including promising trials that could lead to bench-to-clinic applications. METHODS: A literature review based on PubMed publications in the last two decades was performed to summarize progresses in cell-based therapies for SG dysfunction. RESULTS: Over 100 experimental studies have shown the therapeutic potential of several types of cells, such as SG stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells, as well as effectively conditioned mononuclear cells, in both radiation injury and SS animal models. These therapies affect to slow fibrosis progression and stimulate tissue regeneration in atrophic glands. However, to date, only a total of seven studies have been developed to the stage of clinical study, showing the safety and preliminary efficacy. CONCLUSION: To lead the radical effectiveness expected in cell-based therapy, advances in reverse translational research and in innovative experimental research, based on the findings of recent clinical studies, will be critical in the next decade.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".