MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385331246 · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000034311

Could BMMNCs therapy reduce the mid- and long-term rate of total hip arthroplasty of femoral head necrosis?: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2023· review· en· W4385331246 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiao Chen, Jing Chen, Yan-Ji Duan, Chang Chen, Yuan Cao

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone and Joint Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMeta-analysisHarris Hip ScoreConfidence intervalFemoral headRandomized controlled trialOdds ratioSurgeryInternal medicineArthroplasty

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a cause of hip pain and early joint lesion in patient. The hip-preserving treatments are especially important for patients in early stage of ONFH. However, it is controversial of the effectiveness and safety of bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNCs) in the treatment of ONFH. The aim of the study was to explore the mid- and long-term efficacy (particularly the rate of total hip arthroplasty [THA]) with BMMNCs in treatment of ONFH. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, OVID, Cochrane Libriary, CNKI, and Google Scholar databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials or non-randomized controlled trials from inception to October 15, 2022. Methodological quality of the trials was assessed, relevant data were extracted, and RevMan 5.3 and Stata 15.0 software were used to perform the meta-analysis of parameters related to the consequences. RESULTS: A total of 22 articles were included, including 1923 patients. Meta-analysis results showed that the treatment of BMMNCs has a significantly lower incidence of THA (odds ratio [OR] = 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.27-0.41, P < .00001), radiographic progression rate (OR = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.21-0.63, P = .0003) and visual analog score at 24 months (mean difference [MD] = -11.84; 95% CI = -14.86 to -8.82, P < .00001), and has higher Harris hip score (MD = 6.90; 95% CI = 4.56-9.24, P < .00001), improvement of visual analog score at 24 months (MD = 6.87; 95% CI = 1.84-11.89, P = .007) and Merle D'Aubigne and Postel hip score (MD = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.14-1.44, P = .02). But there was no significant difference in the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis index (MD = -6.32; 95% CI = -16.76 to 4.12, P = .24) and incidence of complication (OR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.52-1.42, P = .56). CONCLUSION: Current evidence supports that BMMNCs therapy could reduce the mid- and long-term rate of THA, improve hip function, alleviated the degree of hip pain, delay the progression of imaging staging and not increase the rate of complication, which maybe serve as a preferred option for treating ONFH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.742
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0140.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.217
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicineSame topicBone and Joint DiseasesFrench-language works237,207