MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385332929 · doi:10.25071/2561-5467.1089

Michael John Claringbould, Pacific Profiles Volume Eight: IJN Floatplanes in the South Pacific 1942-1944 by Charles Ross Patterson II

2023· article· en· W4385332929 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Charles Ross Patterson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Northern Mariner / Le marin du nord · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPacific and Southeast Asian Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOceanographyPacific oceanVolume (thermodynamics)Pacific RimHistoryGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Northern Mariner / Le marin du nord One final problem with Defending the Arteries of Rebellion is the inclusion of time as a deficient Confederate resource.The South's lack of time to develop their navy was a direct result of Union advances and military success at key Confederate points, such as New Orleans, Vicksburg, Memphis, and Forts Henry and Donelson, among others, all directly or indirectly targeted as part of the Anaconda Plan, a point that is brought up in the introduction but never properly explored.Unlike the more commonly cited deficiencies that challenged the Confederates (material and factories for iron manufacture, shipbuilding facilities and expertise, and the like) a lack of time was not endemic to the South's wartime condition, but the result of Union advances and success.If Chatelain had supported his assertion that time should be seen as a resource on par with material, infrastructure, and skill, he might have provided an interesting counterpoint to the standard argument, but his analysis offers no insight into what might have been done to gain time or what benefit more time would have provided to the fledgling republic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.199

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Northern Mariner / Le marin du nordSame topicPacific and Southeast Asian StudiesFrench-language works237,207