MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385334613 · doi:10.1101/2023.07.25.550525

Burstprop for Learning in Spiking Neuromorphic Hardware

2023· preprint· en· W4385334613 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaVector Institute
KeywordsNeuromorphic engineeringMNIST databaseSpiking neural networkComputer scienceSpike (software development)Artificial neural networkAdaptation (eye)Artificial intelligenceBackpropagationSpike-timing-dependent plasticityComputer architectureEnergy (signal processing)Machine learningSynaptic plasticityNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The need for energy-efficient solutions in Deep Neural Network (DNN) applications has led to a growing interest in Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) implemented in neuromorphic hardware. The Burstprop algorithm enables online and local learning in hier-archical networks, and therefore can potentially be implemented in neuromorphic hardware. This work presents an adaptation of the algorithm for training hierarchical SNNs on MNIST. Our implementation requires an order of magnitude fewer neurons than the previous ones. While Burstprop outper-forms Spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP), it falls short compared to training with backpropagation through time (BPTT). This work establishes a foundation for further improvements in the Burst-prop algorithm, developing such algorithms is essential for achieving energy-efficient machine learning in neuromorphic hardware.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it