MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385335453 · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.3c01043

Pathways to High-Power-Density Redox Flow Batteries

2023· article· en· W4385335453 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Energy Letters · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced battery technologies research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport SystemsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of EnergyPacific Northwest National LaboratoryNational Science Foundation
KeywordsStack (abstract data type)Power densityEnergy storageRenewable energyPower to gasProcess engineeringMaterials scienceSoftware deploymentElectricityElectricity generationElectrolytePower (physics)Environmental scienceElectrical engineeringComputer scienceEngineering physicsElectrodeEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Redox flow batteries (RFBs) promise to fill a crucial missing link in the energy transition: inexpensive and widely deployable grid and industrial-scale energy storage for intermittent renewable electricity. While numerous lab-scale and demonstration-scale RFBs have been delivered, widespread commercial deployment is still limited by high electrolyte, stack, and balance of plant capital costs. Increasing the power density of RFBs is correlated with lower stack costs, primarily because the area needed for expensive electrode and membrane components to reach a target power density is reduced. In the present contribution, we summarize the areal power densities reported for lab-scale RFBs, critically evaluate major pathways employed for power optimization, and identify opportunities for developing yet-higher power density systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score0.954

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it