MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficient Estimation of Stochastic Power Supply Noise Induced Jitter in CMOS Inverters via Knowledge-Based Neural Networks

2023· article· en· W4385337652 on OpenAlexaff
Ahsan Javaid, Ramachandra Achar, Jai Narayan Tripathi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJitterCMOSComputer scienceInverterElectronic engineeringNoise (video)Artificial neural networkPower (physics)Electrical engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a knowledge-based neural network (KBNN) is developed for predicting jitter in the presence of stochastic power supply noise for CMOS inverter circuits. In the proposed hybrid approach, efficient training for KBNN is proposed using input data extracted from both, analytical expressions for the stochastic power supply noise induced jitter (SPSIJ) as well as small number of data points from a computationally expensive but accurate circuit simulator. The proposed model demonstrates a reasonably accurate prediction of SPSIJ and yields significant speed-up as compared to a circuit simulator (HSPICE) for a case study with 45nm CMOS technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.585

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise SuppressionFrench-language works237,207