Investigations of Different Approaches for Controlling the Speed of an Electric Motor with Nonlinear Dynamics Powered by a Li-ion Battery – Case Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research investigated different nonlinear models, state estimation techniques and control strategies applied to rechargeable Li-ion batteries and electric motors powered and adapted to these batteries. The finality of these investigations was achieved by finding the most suitable design approach for the real-time implementation of the most advanced state estimators based on intelligent neural networks and neural control strategies. For performance comparison purposes, was chosen as case study an accurate and robust EKF state of charge (SOC) estimator built on a simple second-order RC equivalent circuit model (2RC ECM) accurate enough to accomplish the main goal. An intelligent nonlinear autoregressive with exogenous input (NARX) Shallow Neural Network (SSN) estimator was developed to estimate the battery SOC, predict the terminal voltage, and map the nonlinear open circuit voltage (OCV) battery characteristic curve as a function of SOC. Focusing on nonlinear modeling and linearization techniques, such as partial state feedback linearization, for “proof concept” and simulations purposes in the case study, a third order nonlinear model for a DC motor (DCM) drive was selected. It is a valuable research support suitable to analyze the performance of state feedback linearization, system singularities, internal and zero dynamics, and solving reference tracking problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".