MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385351176 · doi:10.14740/wjnu441

A Rare Case of Testicular Plasmacytoma as First Presentation in a Monorchid Patient Without Previous History of Multiple Myeloma: Diagnosis, Management and Review of Literature

2023· article· en· W4385351176 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Carmelo Agostino Di Franco, Sandro Bellavia, Carmela Emmanuele, Genziana Buttafuoco, Francesco Failla, Enrico Grimaldi, Leonardo Lizzio, Emilio Malacasa, Tommaso Torre, Giuseppe Restivo, F Franco, Lavinia Galvagno, Giovanni Bologna

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Nephrology and Urology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMultiple myelomaPlasmacytomaPresentation (obstetrics)AsymptomaticHematologistCase presentationRare diseaseExtramedullary plasmacytomaDiseaseSurgeryPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Testicular plasmacytoma is a rare disease with few described cases in literature since 1939 when the first case was described. Testicular plasmacytoma can occur as first presentation disease or in multiple myeloma relapse. We report a case of a monorchid asymptomatic 70-year-old patient without previous multiple myeloma diagnosis with incidental discovery of right testicular mass who presented with rapid worsening of myeloma-related symptoms immediately after orchifunicolectomy. Diagnosis was made in our urology department and patient was referred to hematologist for continued therapy. We will discuss the case and review the literature. World J Nephrol Urol. 2023;12(1):11-16 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/wjnu441

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of Nephrology and UrologySame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207