Re-framing and fracturing Caribbean-Canadian diasporas through a self-reflexive lens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper begins with an overview of the theorization of diasporic media by various scholars from Canada and the UK, and gestures to how the typology of diasporic media charted by Eugenia Siapera in her chapter ‘Minority and Diasporic Media’ elides an account of alternative diasporic media arts (independent film and video) produced by intersectional plural identities diasporic subjects/artists whose work unsettle relations to the heteronormative, raced and gendered constructions of the nation, nationality, migration. The second part of the article is written from Michelle’s perspective as a queer racialized Caribbean-Canadian diasporic artist, engages in a self-reflexive analysis of the fractured Indo-Caribbean diasporic identity and aesthetics represented inCoconut/Cane & Cutlass(Canada/Guyana, 1994) and Black female and queer subjectivities represented inBlu in You(Canada/Tobago, 2008).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.042 | 0.062 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.020 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".