Automatic Extrinsic Calibration of Thermal Camera and LiDAR for Vehicle Sensor Setups
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
LiDAR is one of the most used sensors in many areas like robotics, self-driving cars, and advanced driving assistance systems due to providing an accurate point cloud of the surroundings. However, to cope with challenges in perceiving the environment around a vehicle, LiDAR data is often combined with data from other sensors. Thermal cameras can provide complementary information that can be beneficial, especially for detecting pedestrians and seeing at nighttime and in fog, dust, etc. In this paper, we propose an algorithm for the extrinsic calibration of a thermal camera and a LiDAR sensor in a vehicle. First, one or more thermal image-point cloud pairs of our designed calibration target are collected. Then line and plane equations of the target’s edges and plane in both data modalities are found. Finally, the algorithm uses lines and plane correspondences to cross-calibrate the sensors. The proposed method obtains good results with one or more poses. We also show that it works well with sparse LiDAR data. Several experiments are presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it