Zero‐Power Shape Retention in Soft Pneumatic Actuators with Extensional and Bending Multistability
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Power‐free shape retention enables soft pneumatic robots to reduce energy cost and avoid unexpected collapse due to burst or puncture. Existing strategies for pneumatic actuation cannot attain motion locking for trajectories combining extension and bending, one of the most common modes of operation. Here, a design paradigm is introduced for soft pneumatic actuators to enable zero‐power locking for shape retention in both extension and bending. The underpinning mechanism is the integration of a pneumatic transmitter and a multistable guider, which are programmed to interact for balanced load transfer, flexural and extension steering, and progressive snapping leading to state locking. Through theory, simulations, and experiments on proof‐of‐concept actuators, the existence of four distinct regimes of deformation is unveiled, where the constituents first interact during inflation to attain locking in extension and bending, and then cooperate under vacuum to enable fully reversible functionality. Finally, the design paradigm is demonstrated to realize a soft robotic arm capable to lock at desired curvature states at zero‐power, and a gripper that safely operates with puncture resistance to grasp and hold objects of various shapes and consistency. The study promises further development for zero‐power soft robots endowed with multiple deformation modes, sequential deployment, and tunable multistability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it