MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385364271 · doi:10.59962/9780774837101-012

Notes

2019· book-chapter· en· W4385364271 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of British Columbia Press eBooks · 2019
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFoucault, Power, and Ethics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGoddard Space Flight CenterUniversity of TorontoCanada Council for the ArtsMcGill UniversityUniversity of MinnesotaQueen's UniversityNorthwestern University
KeywordsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Socio-legal theorists Alan Hunt and Gary Wickham emphasize the role law plays in these "multiform tactics": "The deployment of 'multiform tactics' is illustrated in the link that exists between 'government' and 'population' where a variety of experts (quantifying, calculating and codifying) scattered across a range of agencies generate social policies that operate both to constitute the 'social problems' at which governmental action is directed and actively to regulate, control and coordinate the targets thus created." Alan Hunt and Gary Wickham, Foucault and the Law: Towards a Sociology of Law as Governance (London: Pluto, 1994), 53. 13 Richard Burt, "Introduction: The 'New' Cen sorship, " in The Administration of Aesthetics: Censorship, Political Criticism, and the Public Sphere (Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, 1994), xviii.Although I am referring generally to legal processes, including related processes of legislature, case and civil law, and police and punitive processes, my reference to "the law" artificially unifies it and should be taken as a verbal construct for the sake of clarity.See Hunt and Wickham, Foucault and the Law, 40.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3120.133

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of British Columbia Press eBooksSame topicFoucault, Power, and EthicsFrench-language works237,207