MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385364408 · doi:10.22323/1.444.0659

TeV Detection of the Extreme HSP Blazar RBS 1366 by VERITAS

2023· article· en· W4385364408 on OpenAlexfundno aff
D. Ribeiro

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Energy Research Scientific Computing CenterU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of ScienceSmithsonian InstitutionNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBlazarPhysicsAstrophysicsFermi Gamma-ray Space TelescopeSynchrotronCherenkov radiationParticle accelerationActive galactic nucleusAstronomySpectral energy distributionContext (archaeology)ObservatoryGamma rayAccelerationGalaxyDetectorNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extreme high-synchrotron-peak blazars (EHSPs) are postulated as the most efficient and extreme particle accelerators in the universe but remain enigmatic as a possible new class of TeV gamma-ray blazars. Blazars are active galactic nuclei (AGNs) with jets of relativistic particles that generate non-thermal emission pointed along the line-of-sight. Their spectral energy distribution (SED) are characterized by synchrotron and inverse-Compton peaks, indicating acceleration of leptonic and possibly hadronic particle populations in the jet. EHSPs are characterized by a peak synchrotron frequency $>10^{17}{Hz}$ with their Compton peak expected to fall in the TeV range. Indeed, the handful of EHSPs detected by Imaging Air Cherenkov Telescopes (IACTs) have presented challenges where some may be a high-frequency extension of the blazar sequence while others peaking around 10 TeV may represent a different class of TeV emitters. Detections of the high-energy and very-high-energy (HE; E > 100 MeV, VHE; E > 100 GeV) components of the Compton peak will play an important role in constraining the acceleration model derived from the SED. We present the discovery of TeV emission from RBS 1366, a candidate EHSP, by the VERITAS observatory. Using HE and VHE data from the \fermi and VERITAS observatories, respectively, we characterize the detection by providing an SED and model fit in the context of other EHSP candidates. Our work confirms the status of RBS 1366 as an EHBL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207