MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385370441 · doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2023.105530

Comparative verification of hydro-mechanical fracture behavior: Task G of international research project DECOVALEX–2023

2023· article· en· W4385370441 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNumerical methods in engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaCanadian Nuclear Safety Commission
FundersCanadian Nuclear Safety CommissionMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaEidgenössisches NuklearsicherheitsinspektoratHelmholtz-Zentrum für UmweltforschungJapan Atomic Energy AgencyNuclear Waste Management OrganizationInstitute for Korea Spent Nuclear FuelKorea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral ResourcesChinese Academy of SciencesTechnische Universität Bergakademie FreibergKorea Atomic Energy Research InstituteNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaUniversity of EdinburghStrålsäkerhetsmyndighetenNational Research FoundationNational Research Foundation of KoreaU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsBenchmark (surveying)Computer scienceDiscretizationDomain (mathematical analysis)Computer simulationTask (project management)Scale (ratio)SimulationGeologyEngineeringMathematicsSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it